texstudio looking for wrong version of texlive

#TEXSTUDIO LOOKING FOR WRONG VERSION OF TEXLIVE INSTALL#
#TEXSTUDIO LOOKING FOR WRONG VERSION OF TEXLIVE UPDATE#
#TEXSTUDIO LOOKING FOR WRONG VERSION OF TEXLIVE FULL#
#TEXSTUDIO LOOKING FOR WRONG VERSION OF TEXLIVE DOWNLOAD#
#TEXSTUDIO LOOKING FOR WRONG VERSION OF TEXLIVE WINDOWS#

Perhaps a note could be added to the documentation / website to recommend to users of MiKTeX that they should install TeXstudio with apt install -no-install-recommends texstudio. I just assumed that the default behaviour would be to not install anything more than required.Īs a side note, Texmaker does not recommend the TeX Live packages, so running apt install texmaker (without the -no-install-recommends) is sufficient. Libpoppler-qt5-1 libqtermwidget5-0 libutf8proc2 qtermwidget5-data texstudioĠ to upgrade, 5 to newly install, 0 to remove and 3 not to upgrade.Īfter this operation, 107 MB of additional disk space will be used. Libpoppler-qt5-1 libqtermwidget5-0 libutf8proc2 qtermwidget5-dataįonts-hack texlive-latex-base texlive-latex-extra texlive-latex-recommended texlive-base latex-beamer dvipng $ sudo apt -no-install-recommends install texstudio I'm not sure why though because, as you rightly point out, in the Debian control file here it says that the TeX Live packages are recommended not required. So it will install the TeX Live packages. Texlive-latex-extra texlive-latex-recommended texlive-pictures texlive-plain-generic texstudio tipa tk tk8.6Ġ to upgrade, 52 to newly install, 0 to remove and 3 not to upgrade.Īfter this operation, 567 MB of additional disk space will be used. The following NEW packages will be installed Ruby-tcltk | libtcltk-ruby texlive-pictures-doc vprerex default-jre-headless Texlive-latex-base-doc python3-pygments icc-profiles libfile-which-perl libspreadsheet-parseexcel-perl texlive-latex-extra-doc texlive-latex-recommended-doc texlive-luatex texlive-pstricks dot2tex prerex Libavalon-framework-java libcommons-logging-java-doc libexcalibur-logkit-java liblog4j1.2-java ri ruby-dev bundler tcl-tclreadline debhelper perl-tk xpdf | pdf-viewer xzdec texlive-fonts-recommended-doc Texlive-latex-extra texlive-latex-recommended texlive-pictures texlive-plain-generic tipa tk tk8.6 Ruby-power-assert ruby-test-unit ruby-xmlrpc ruby2.7 rubygems-integration t1utils tcl tcl8.6 tex-common tex-gyre texlive-base texlive-binaries texlive-fonts-recommended texlive-latex-base Libqtermwidget5-0 libruby2.7 libsynctex2 libtcl8.6 libteckit0 libtexlua53 libtexluajit2 libtk8.6 libutf8proc2 lmodern preview-latex-style qtermwidget5-data rake ruby ruby-minitest ruby-net-telnet The following additional packages will be installed:ĭvipng dvisvgm fonts-hack fonts-lato fonts-lmodern fonts-texgyre libapache-pom-java libcommons-logging-java libcommons-parent-java libfontbox-java libkpathsea6 libpdfbox-java libpoppler-qt5-1 libptexenc1 Perhaps it is not as easy as just removing the dependency in the Debian packaging, but it would be very handy to be able to easily install TeXstudio without the requirement to install TeX Live.

#TEXSTUDIO LOOKING FOR WRONG VERSION OF TEXLIVE DOWNLOAD#

This happens if you download and run the AppImage on a fresh install of Ubuntu before you have installed MiKTeX or TeX Live.ĭoes TeXstudio really require these TeX Live packages to be installed? Would it not be sufficient to rely on this existing warning message to prompt the user to install the LaTeX distribution of their choosing? If the required programs are not on the path, then a warning is shown to the user. TeX Studio currently checks whether LaTeX is on the path at startup. Users who wish to use MiKTeX instead of TeX Live on Linux.

#TEXSTUDIO LOOKING FOR WRONG VERSION OF TEXLIVE UPDATE#

However, I would prefer to use the Ubuntu PPA and install TeXstudio with apt install as usual so that I can keep my system up-to-date with apt update & apt upgrade. This does not require TeX Live to be installed. The workaround for me is to use the AppImage instead of the Debian package. I do not wish to install TeX Live on my system because I prefer to use MiKTeX (because it often has more up-to-date packages, at least for the ones I use).

The TeXstudio deb package currently depends on the texlive-latex-base, texlive-latex-extra, texlive-latex-recommended, and texlive-base packages.

#TEXSTUDIO LOOKING FOR WRONG VERSION OF TEXLIVE WINDOWS#

Am I using the correct syntax for relative paths? This is a Windows machine by the way.Describe the feature and the current behavior/state Obviously it can't find the executables anymore. The added features have to be complete and sufficiently tested. (null): fatal: Can't determine where the executable. Projects 1 Wiki Security Insights Frequently Asked Questions sunderme edited this page on 9 revisions When will the next release be available There is no fixed release schedule for TXS. Now when I try to compile the same file I get the following error: Process started: './texlive/bin/win32/pdflatex' -synctex=1 -interaction=nonstopmode 'texstudio_pG4740'.tex PDFLaTeX: './texlive/bin/win32/pdflatex' -synctex=1 -interaction=nonstopmode %.tex To make my installation portable, I changed the paths to relative ones so I could use the USB stick on other PCs. It compiled a basic Hello World file fine (PDFLaTeX). When I ran TexStudio from the USB I initially set up direct paths to the TeXlive directory (USB stick is drive D): PDFLaTeX: 'D:/texlive/bin/win32/pdflatex' -synctex=1 -interaction=nonstopmode %.texĮtc.

#TEXSTUDIO LOOKING FOR WRONG VERSION OF TEXLIVE FULL#

I have just installed TeXLive 2013 Portable (Windows, full install) on my USB stick, and have also extracted the TeXstudio USB zip into the root of my USB.

Texstudio looking for wrong version of texlive